A new report says farmers are relying too much on crop insurance to manage the risks of farming, and soil conservation would be a better long-term solution.From 2001 to 2010, the Federal Crop Insurance Program averaged about $4 billion a year in payouts to farmers for lost crops. Last year, that amount was a record-breaking $17.3 billion to farmers across the countrynearly all for crops lost because of drought,Online supplies a large range of double sided tape. heat and hot wind.My way of applying kapton tape to Glass. More than $1.5 billion of that money went to farmers in Kentucky and Indiana.
But a new report from the Natural Resources Defense Council suggests an alternative to this insurance program. Because extreme weather eventslike droughtare projected to increase under climate change, Agricultural Policy Analyst Claire OConnor says it wont make economic sense to keep relying on crop insurance. She says that means farmers should change the way they farm to reduce their risk.
And so what our proposal does, it says lets incentivize farmers to start adopting practices that not only reduce the risk of losing their crops in any year, but make them more resilient to the extreme weather we expect to see in the future, she says.
These practices include cover cropping and no-till farming.Both refer to practices that can build soil health, OConnor says. Make soil the insurance policy. Because healthy soil can filter more water, it can retain that water and save it for when growing crops need to use it.
David Akin, the citys Public Utilities customer advocate, said he helps locals get their water bills adjusted after a leak is fixed, repairs done on the city side of their meter, navigate bureaucracy when getting a new or smaller meter installed and assists if they are not getting the help needed when calling for customer care.
He answered the questions of around two dozen residents at Monday nights workshop on how to conserve water and understand water bills. The event was hosted by City Councilman Mark Kersey at the Rancho Bernardo Library.Think of me as your seat at the table, Akin said. I help navigate the complexity of the city.
Akin explained why there is a base fee on water bills it recovers fixed costs based on meter size plus three-tiered usage pricing. The latter customers can control through conservation. The wastewater section also has a base fee, but customers can control their annual service fee rates by using less water from December to March, when the fee is adjusted for the coming year.
Akin said there are three reasons a bill can suddenly be high there was higher water consumption than thought (factors include new landscaping, over watering, filling a pool or pond, guests, kids home for the summer, hose left on and warmer weather), there is a water system leak or meter reading error.
If there is a leak in an irrigation system, toilet, water heater, washing machine, hidden pipes or service line, sometimes the bill can be adjusted after repairs are made, he said. A common problem is the pressure valve that should be occasionally checked.
Steps are being taken to generate more local water, but are several years off. A desalination plant will provide 7 percent of the water San Diegans need when it comes online in 2016. Desalination is not cheap, but when its done will be a reliable source, Kersey said.As for recycling water for potable use, Kersey said, I was skeptical at the beginning, but now think it makes a lot of sense.
He said San Diegans are to be commended for reducing water consumption a few years ago when drought conditions and water supply shortages necessitated it, and is encouraging locals to continue those efforts.Hopefully it was not too big a crimp on your lifestyle, he said.
Kersey said through office budget savings by himself and predecessor, Carl DeMaio, some District 5 tax dollars have recently been redirected to installing smart controllers in Carmel Mountain Ranch medians, converting landscaping in some Rancho Bernardo medians to drought-tolerant plants and relandscaping some Black Mountain Ranch medians to require less water.
Commenters on the proposed Shoshone National Forest management plan favor conservation, according to a new analysis by several environmental groups.Matco Packaging Llc suppliers of BOPP tape,
The U.S. Forest Service received more than 23,000 comments on the proposed plan. The analysis focuses on the roughly 1,000 of those that aren't form letters. Connie Wilbert, with the Sierra Club of Wyoming, helped with the analysis. She says the results weren't unexpected.
We have heardoftenin the cooperator meetings that there isnt strong public support for conserving the remaining undeveloped parts of the forest. And we believe thats simply not true, and now we have the evidence to show that, Wilbert says.
The analysis breaks down comments into three topics - wilderness areas, motorized use, and oil and gas development. It then categorizes the comments as for or against. Wilbert says comments that didnt clearly fit into a category or were ambiguous were excluded. The results show that 75 percent of commentersboth Wyomingites and non-residentsare opposed to expanding motorized use of the forest. Ninty-nine percent are opposed to opening new areas to oil and gas development.
But a new report from the Natural Resources Defense Council suggests an alternative to this insurance program. Because extreme weather eventslike droughtare projected to increase under climate change, Agricultural Policy Analyst Claire OConnor says it wont make economic sense to keep relying on crop insurance. She says that means farmers should change the way they farm to reduce their risk.
And so what our proposal does, it says lets incentivize farmers to start adopting practices that not only reduce the risk of losing their crops in any year, but make them more resilient to the extreme weather we expect to see in the future, she says.
These practices include cover cropping and no-till farming.Both refer to practices that can build soil health, OConnor says. Make soil the insurance policy. Because healthy soil can filter more water, it can retain that water and save it for when growing crops need to use it.
David Akin, the citys Public Utilities customer advocate, said he helps locals get their water bills adjusted after a leak is fixed, repairs done on the city side of their meter, navigate bureaucracy when getting a new or smaller meter installed and assists if they are not getting the help needed when calling for customer care.
He answered the questions of around two dozen residents at Monday nights workshop on how to conserve water and understand water bills. The event was hosted by City Councilman Mark Kersey at the Rancho Bernardo Library.Think of me as your seat at the table, Akin said. I help navigate the complexity of the city.
Akin explained why there is a base fee on water bills it recovers fixed costs based on meter size plus three-tiered usage pricing. The latter customers can control through conservation. The wastewater section also has a base fee, but customers can control their annual service fee rates by using less water from December to March, when the fee is adjusted for the coming year.
Akin said there are three reasons a bill can suddenly be high there was higher water consumption than thought (factors include new landscaping, over watering, filling a pool or pond, guests, kids home for the summer, hose left on and warmer weather), there is a water system leak or meter reading error.
If there is a leak in an irrigation system, toilet, water heater, washing machine, hidden pipes or service line, sometimes the bill can be adjusted after repairs are made, he said. A common problem is the pressure valve that should be occasionally checked.
Steps are being taken to generate more local water, but are several years off. A desalination plant will provide 7 percent of the water San Diegans need when it comes online in 2016. Desalination is not cheap, but when its done will be a reliable source, Kersey said.As for recycling water for potable use, Kersey said, I was skeptical at the beginning, but now think it makes a lot of sense.
He said San Diegans are to be commended for reducing water consumption a few years ago when drought conditions and water supply shortages necessitated it, and is encouraging locals to continue those efforts.Hopefully it was not too big a crimp on your lifestyle, he said.
Kersey said through office budget savings by himself and predecessor, Carl DeMaio, some District 5 tax dollars have recently been redirected to installing smart controllers in Carmel Mountain Ranch medians, converting landscaping in some Rancho Bernardo medians to drought-tolerant plants and relandscaping some Black Mountain Ranch medians to require less water.
Commenters on the proposed Shoshone National Forest management plan favor conservation, according to a new analysis by several environmental groups.Matco Packaging Llc suppliers of BOPP tape,
The U.S. Forest Service received more than 23,000 comments on the proposed plan. The analysis focuses on the roughly 1,000 of those that aren't form letters. Connie Wilbert, with the Sierra Club of Wyoming, helped with the analysis. She says the results weren't unexpected.
We have heardoftenin the cooperator meetings that there isnt strong public support for conserving the remaining undeveloped parts of the forest. And we believe thats simply not true, and now we have the evidence to show that, Wilbert says.
The analysis breaks down comments into three topics - wilderness areas, motorized use, and oil and gas development. It then categorizes the comments as for or against. Wilbert says comments that didnt clearly fit into a category or were ambiguous were excluded. The results show that 75 percent of commentersboth Wyomingites and non-residentsare opposed to expanding motorized use of the forest. Ninty-nine percent are opposed to opening new areas to oil and gas development.
Read the full products at www.sdktapegroup.com!
No comments:
Post a Comment